• 131 West 35th Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10001
  • 1-646-883-HRMD
  • info@hurecomaverick.com
Hureco Maverick
Hureco Maverick
  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Essential HR
    • HR Business Solutions
    • Non-Profit HR Solutions
    • Organizational Development
    • Employee Engagement
    • Career Development
  • Hureco Maverick News
  • About Hureco Maverick
  • Contact Us
MENU CLOSE back  

Diversity and Inclusion Stategies: Intercultural Communication – Part I

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Human Resources News
  3. Diversity and Inclusion Stategies: Intercultural Communication – Part I

shutterstock_192419591It is easy to see that without the ability to communicate well across cultural boundaries, little in the way of creating diversity and inclusion programs can be made “real.” Diversity and inclusion has become in some respects, a cliche of a term for organizations to express their intent or the actuality of their recruitment and hiring practices being inclusive of a diverse pool of candidates. However, diversity and inclusion is larger in scope than merely recruitment and hiring and should include a foundational understanding of intercultural communication.

Organizations that wish to be diverse and inclusive will examine, assess, create or redesign their diversity and inclusion strategies to cover the following areas:

  • Organizational biases: social categorization, stereotyping and prejudice
  • Cultural competency leadership models
  • Intercultural communications processes
  • Organizational customs, norms and standards
  • Recruitment, hiring and retention practices
  • Training methodologies for diversity and inclusion
  • Career development: appraisal and promotional practices

Culture

The first question we must ask and answer is: what is culture?

Culture is defined as the shared patterns of behaviors and interactions, cognitive constructs, and affective understanding that are learned through a process of socialization. These shared patterns identify the members of a culture group while also distinguishing those of another group.

Due to ethnocentric notions American workers have an expectation that some form of cultural assimilation take place so that other cultures learn our ways of communicating and doing business if working in America. These ethnocentric notions are at play in the underlying sentiment of American workers that we are a global workforce and as such the world is perceived as one place with one practice (the American way) and some are oblivious to national cultures, considering them irrelevant.

A case study analysis of NYC workforce centers and their aptly named Center Challenges Committee (a quality circle comprised of the system’s leadership and managerial employees) serves as the means of observation for Hureco Maverick’s intercultural communications model. Our model aims at building culturally competent leadership and creating diversity and inclusion programs.

The observation yielded two specific intercultural myths that were pervasive in the interaction of the committee members:

(1) The global village

(2) The universality myth

The myths were witnessed in the minority group (who happen to be of the majority/dominant culture in America). These are American-born committee members who expressed that the American norms, standards, practices and procedures apply to communication, no matter whom the speaker or audience is, and where s/he is. These worldviews, mind-sets and thought processes were problematic in creating cooperation and consensus for problem resolution amongst the committee members.

The myth of the world as a global village where everyone shares the same values is counterproductive to business and communication in manners that are equitable and fair to those who do not wish to be absorbed into another culture. While there is some assimilation that is reasonably expected in the workplace, we should not consider Americanisms as the ideal or “right” way of thinking and doing things and hence there is not universal way of thinking, perceiving and doing.

With these myths in mind we explore the questions needed for analysis and resolution. The overarching question is:

Were cultural competencies being used in committee communications?

To answer this question, additional questions and analysis of applicable models are required, one of which is Bennett’s six stages to intercultural sensitivity. With the additional examination questions including:

1. How are Bennett’s six stages to intercultural sensitivity observable in committee communication?

2. In what observable ways do we differ, and how did this affect the committee members’ communication using Hofstede’s dimensions of national culture?

3. Were managers observing nonverbal cultural sensitivities?

4. How to develop culturally competent/interculturally sensitive communicators?

Bennett

Bennett describes six stages of intercultural sensitivity that he refers to as minimization.* These minimizations shrink other cultural nuances into minutia and sometimes oblivion as we attempt to calm our fears of difference by focusing on the similarities. Thus, we do not seek to have deeper insights into a culture that would reveal major differences in beliefs, norms, mores and values.

In observing the impact of the lack of acceptance of cultural diversity, we concluded that enhancing our communication comes about by focusing our effort on three constructs:

1. Ethnocentrism

2. Intercultural communication sensitivity

3. Multiculturalism

We suggest that team-building can be used to overcome “othering” and viewing “people from the outside” as malevolent, beginning with learning more about the cultures of those we work with. We suggest simple ideas such as culturally themed gatherings and lunches, sharing of proverbs and folklore that can be applied to business and with spending time together in non-work-related situations.

The first three of Bennett’s six stages to intercultural sensitivity were observable in the committee’s interactions:

1. Denial of difference

2. Defense against difference

3. Minimization of difference

4. Acceptance of difference

5. Adaptations to difference

6. Integration of difference

A Closer Look

Members of the committee often spoke in terms of “the others,” with the Caucasian and African American native-born employees considering the Latino/Latina employees as the out-group, although they outnumbered the American native-born. The Latino/Latina employees considered and spoke of the American native-born as “the others,” from their perspectives. Both groups denied their difference and defended against their differences after Hureco Maverick conducted a series of “discrimination in the workplace” trainings in the fall of 2013. The committee even sought to minimize their difference for a period of time. This was exhibited in their desire to prove that “the others” were not an out-group but readily accepted. They sought to find similarities instead of seeking to understand, accept, and embrace their differences.

However, it was and is evident that there is a spoken conveyance (in non-political or discriminatory terms) of “the others” and an unspoken undergirding of stereotyping that has led to negative prejudice and negative behaviors against outsiders. It is interesting to witness both sides come together when there is a third group that can be “othered.” This is typically anyone who is in opposition of the committee and centers’ staffs’ collective goals; such as jobseekers who are ill-prepared for their interviews, employers who do not wish to hire the centers’ jobseekers and/or government administrators whose policies at times adversely affect the centers’ placement outcomes.

It is Hureco Maverick’s aim to ensure progression via upcoming online and offline team building exercises focused on nonverbal communication and kinesthetic behaviors, as these are the areas that require immediate attention – at times the unspoken screams! Cultural competency training and proprietary diversity and inclusion programmatic strategies will be used to move the  committee from the unfavorable first three stages into areas of cultural acceptance, adaptation and integration.

In part two of this article, we’ll take a look at Hofstede’s six dimensions of national culture to help shed some light on the nature of conflict amongst committee members and provide some insights on resolution.

Contact us today to learn more about our diversity and inclusion programs and cultural competency training!

*Dr. Milton Bennett is the creator of The Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity – Bennett, Milton J. “Towards a Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity” in R. Michael Paige, ed. Education for the Intercultural Experience. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press

Posted on August 1, 2020
By The PrincipalsHuman Resources News

About the author

Regina Jones and Rashied K. Sharrieff-Al-Bey are the principals at Hureco Maverick; they enjoy co-authoring blogs, journal articles, case studies and white papers about various human resource, organization development and business topics.

Related posts

shutterstock_146191232
Baby Boomers in the Workplace: Ensuring Knowledge Transfer
March 1, 2021
shutterstock_170386763
Interview Prep: How to Destress the “Stress Interview”
February 1, 2021
shutterstock_195316619
Strategies for Managing Knowledge Workers
January 1, 2021
shutterstock_156861986
Conflict Resolution in the Workplace: Creating a Win-Win Problem Solving Process
December 1, 2020
Performance Management NYC
Individual Development Plans: Employee & Employer Road Map to Success
November 1, 2020
shutterstock_189813563
Generations: Employee Training Methodologies for Diversity and Inclusion
October 1, 2020
Our Services
  • Essential HR
  • HR Business Solutions
  • Non-Profit HR Solutions
  • Organizational Development
  • Employee Engagement
  • Career Development
What Clients Are Saying:
  • “I had a great experience working with Hureco Maverick. I own two small businesses that have been running like ‘mom and pop’ shops. They helped me create a solid foundation of employee policies, procedures and manuals making my small business operate like a large corporation. I would recommend Hureco Maverick for any small business that is trying to take their business to the next level. They are smart, professional and a pleasure to work with.”
    Image title 11
    Alexis Ufland
    Owner of Sparty
  • “Hureco Maverick’s consultants are experts, very sincere in their approach to organizational development and recruitment. I found the principals and the consultants to be a true pleasure to work with.”
    Image title 09
    Mark Silver
    Human Resources, Deloitte
  • “Hureco Maverick helped shape our organizational culture to enhance communication between divisions which built morale amongst long-term employees. They were instrumental in the creation of our performance management process and recruiting plan. We now have a very well defined HR structure in areas where we needed improvement and are operating with newly implemented systems for employee relations.
    img016
    Janine Pierre
    Janine Pierre VP of HR, Global Apparel Retailer
  • “It was impressive the level and depth of knowledge of your nonprofit HR consultants. They helped our office to identify what areas we needed additional help with. The design of the training program was excellent and the delivery superb, all within our budget. Thanks for working with us to make it happen!”
    Image title 08
    Claire Wright
    Human Resources Manager, American Red Cross
  • “Thank you for the employee engagement workshop you provided for the CUNY COPE Program staff rally. Your workshop was very entertaining and informative, and based on their level of participation as well as their evaluations, was well-received by the audience of staff of varying levels including administrative support, employment specialists, case managers, counselors and directors representing 9 campuses and our central office.”
    Image title 02
    Deborah Douglass
    Executive Director, Education & Training Programs, City University of New York (CUNY)
  • “Your presentation was very well organized and very targeted to the audience. You, I know, heard some of the audience comments at the end of the presentation. I hope we can call on Hureco Maverick again for this or another topic in our next cycle of programs. On behalf of our committee, thanks so much for delivering your Candidate Fitness Boot Camp™ program for us.”
    Image title 09
    Constance W. Klages
    Director, Employment Advisory Council, 5th Avenue Presbyterian Church
Hureco Maverick
© 2016 Hureco Maverick, Inc. All rights reserved.